Course Evaluations

The University of Maryland School of Nursing conducts evaluations for all baccalaureate, master’s, and doctoral courses offered each semester.

This provides enrolled students with the opportunity to provide thoughtful and constructive feedback on their courses and experience with faculty members. This course evaluation is in an online format and can be accessed from computers and mobile devices with Internet access.

Course Evaluation Login

Clinical Site Evaluation Login

QR code for Course evaluation
Course Evaluation





Clinical Evaluation

Importance of Course Evaluation

Course evaluations are vital for ensuring quality education and ongoing program improvement at UMSON. They fulfill several important roles:

  • Accreditation Compliance: Evaluations demonstrate adherence to accreditation standards, helping programs maintain their status.
  • Course Quality Assurance: Feedback from students highlights strengths and areas for improvement in courses delivery and teaching.
  • Student Feedback: Evaluations allow students to express their experiences, enabling faculty to adapt their teaching methods accordingly.
  • Faculty Evaluation: Student feedback contributes to annual evaluations and decisions regarding ongoing employment and promotion.
  • Faculty Development: Results identify areas for faculty support and training, enhancing teaching effectiveness.
  • Curriculum Development: Evaluation data guides curriculum revisions to align with the evolving needs of the nursing profession.
  • Continuous Improvement: Regular assessments foster a culture of growth, allowing faculty to refine practices and improve student learning outcomes.

Course Evaluation Forms

  • Course Evaluation Form: The UMSON online course evaluation form contains a total of 16 items with five response ratings ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). It includes 8 items in the course evaluation questionnaire (CEQ) and 8 items in the faculty evaluation questionnaire (FEQ). Three open-ended questions allow students to provide specific feedback to faculty members, and a fourth item solicits additional comments.
  • Clinical Instructor Evaluation Form: The clinical instructor evaluation uses the same form as the FEQ.
  • Entry-level Program Clinical Site Evaluation Form: There are two forms for clinical site evaluation: One is for students to evaluate the clinical site, and the other is for the clinical instructor to evaluate the clinical site

Course Evaluation Calendar

Session Course Evaluation Open Date Course Evaluation Close Date Course Evaluation Reports Released
Fall Dec. 1 Dec. 31 Jan. 5
Spring May 1 May 31 June 5
Summer July 15 July 31 Aug. 5

Entry-level Program Clinical Evaluation Calendar

Session Clinical Evaluation Open Date Clinical Evaluation Close Date Clinical Evaluation Reports Released
Fall

Rotation 1: Oct. 1
Rotation 2: Dec. 1

Dec. 31 Jan. 5
Spring Rotation 1: March 1
Rotation 2: May 1
May 31 June 5
Summer Rotation 1: July 15
Rotation 2: July 15
July 31 Aug. 5

 

Information for Students

To access the course evaluation system, you will need to login in with your UMID and password.

What is the importance of student voice?

There are several reasons students should complete their evaluations.

  1. Help faculty understand student needs: Instructors use the course evaluations to improve their teaching.
  2. Shapes future course offerings: Each faculty receives a course evaluation report and the comments to use in evaluating their own teaching and planning future courses.
  3. Teaching excellence matters: Department chairs, program associate deans, and administrative leadership use student evaluations as a part of the tenure and promotion process.

How is student feedback used?

  1. In addition to course instructor, the academic deans and department chairs are also responsible for reviewing the Course Evaluation results every semester.
  2. When a course CEQ mean rating is below benchmark, the academic dean meets and discusses the evaluation results with the department chair to determine issues and actions.
  3. When a course FEQ mean rating is below benchmark, the department chair meets and discusses with the individual faculty member to determine issues and actions.

Is there an assurance of confidentiality for UMSON course evaluations?

  1. The UMSON course evaluations are anonymous.
  2. Student feedback on the course evaluations will not affect student grades.
  3. Course evaluation results will be available after the course grades are released.

How can students provide constructive feedback?

Constructive feedback highlights both strengths and areas for improvement, providing actionable suggestions while maintaining a positive and supportive tone.

Below are some examples:

  • Content Clarity:
    "The course materials were well-organized, but some concepts, like [specific topic], could benefit from more detailed explanations or additional resources. Consider incorporating more visual aids or examples to clarify these points."
  • Engagement and Participation:
    "I appreciated the interactive elements of the course, such as group discussions. However, I think more opportunities for small group work would enhance student engagement and allow for deeper discussions on the topics covered."
  • Instructor Feedback:
    "The instructor was knowledgeable and approachable, which I really appreciated. However, receiving more timely feedback on assignments would help me understand my progress better and improve my learning outcomes.”

250x250We Value Your Feedback!

As we seek to improve, your insights are crucial!

UMB Core Value: Integrity and Respect

  • Be Honest: Your genuine feedback helps us grow.
  • Be Kind: Remember, there’s a hardworking person on the receiving end, navigating their own challenges.

How to Provide Feedback:

  • Constructive Comments: Focus on what worked and what could be improved.
  • Respectful Language: Choose words that uplift and encourage growth.

Your voice matters, and we appreciate your thoughtful input!

As a reminder, students should adhere to the UMB Code of Conduct when completing the course evaluations, ensuing that their feedback is professional, civil, respectful, and courteous. Remember to provide feedback in the way you would like to receive it.

Information for Faculty

Faculty can access individual course evaluation reports in the course evaluation system.

The Office of Evaluation provides an annual course evaluation report at the end of the academic year. This annual course evaluation report presents the aggregate results of course evaluations by program and shows whether the UMSON course evaluation benchmarks were met. There are 8 questions in the course evaluation questionnaire (CEQ) and another 8 questions in the faculty evaluation questionnaire (FEQ).

UMSON is devoted to excellence in teaching practices and committed to evaluating its educational program and using evaluation data to foster ongoing improvement. The Policy on Course and Faculty Evaluations describes the course evaluation review process, which aims to improve course content and instructional methods to enhance student learning experiences and implement adjustments as necessary.

Tips for encouraging students both to complete course evaluations and to provide constructive feedback: (adapted from UC, Berkely)

  1. Just as with paper-based surveys, allocate some class time at the end of the semester for students to complete the online course evaluation. Remind them to bring a device, such as a smartphone or laptop, to class so they can participate.
  2. A quick visual tutorial in-class can make a difference. Taking a few minutes of class time to show students how to find and use the Course Evaluations system may increase response rates.
  3. Inform students about the purpose of evaluations:
    1. Explain the importance of student feedback.
    2. Let students know that their inputs will be used to improve the course.
    3. Share examples of constructive feedback you’ve received in the past, and how it positively impacted course delivery and teaching. 
  4. Encourage Students to Complete the Course Evaluation in Your Syllabus: By including the course evaluation alongside other course assignments in your syllabus—even though it carries no points—you can help increase response rates.

    Faculty play a key role in boosting response rates. To encourage participation, faculty can set aside some time during the last class meeting to share the PowerPoint presentation before inviting students to complete the evaluations.